i would like to state that the class agreed to the prank. or at least, the people i spoke to did, and i believe they represented their groups. and even the enthu ones, didn't do it in the end. and what, even the person that came up with the idea didn't do it. if dared to think up that idea, dared to agree to it, why didn't you dare to go through with it? yi ren shi yi ren dang; you're responsible for what you do.

yes, i suppose the jh108-is-not-united comments is not really called for. and i do partially agree with rachel ann. so on the group's behalf, i'll like to say sorry to the class.

but i want to ask, where's the class' sense of responsibilty to the agreement? if you agreed to it, and didn't go through with it, what does that say about you? yes, i admit that i wasn't very willing to walk out. but i agreed to do it. and i did it, out of loyalty to the group and to upload the agreement.

i honestly don't feel that the PMs know what happened well enough to critize and slam us about it. maybe that wasn't intentional, but our group was quite upset about the obvious pin-pointing. no, i'm not saying that it wasn't our fault. but the PMs see us for, at most, two to three hours a day, while jh108 spends more than double of that time together. do you think that after three months we don't know what our classmates are like? i feel that the PMs only see a small fraction of what goes on. they miss out on a lot. things that happen are not always done on purpose or whatever, but sometimes just plain invoked. the PMs heard from gwen, martin, rachel ann and sheryl. that's a mere 16%. can you say that they speak for the rest of the class? we are, very different people. our opinions differ. we have different sets of morals. but i don't think it's right to break an agreement regardless. i think it's widely known that one sees what he wants to see, and may not always be objective.

regardless, i hope this won't happen again. and that this calls for greater teamwork and planning.

on a seperate note, tomorrow is the last day, so please bring the newspapers. i keep reminding you guys but nothing gets done. you tell me to shut up that i've said it so many times, but what, do you do anything? so please, please, bring the newspapers. each person, please try to cough up 'bout 10cm of newspapers. i hope you received gwen's message, i really don't want to stay back extra or see people get scolded. thank you.

oh and richelle please change the blogskin since jx hasn't done so.

ruiying :)

i would like to state that the class agreed to the prank. or at least, the people i spoke to did, and i believe they represented their groups. and even the enthu ones, didn't do it in the end. and what, even the person that came up with the idea didn't do it. if dared to think up that idea, dared to agree to it, why didn't you dare to go through with it? yi ren shi yi ren dang; you're responsible for what you do.

yes, i suppose the jh108-is-not-united comments is not really called for. and i do partially agree with rachel ann. so on the group's behalf, i'll like to say sorry to the class.

but i want to ask, where's the class' sense of responsibilty to the agreement? if you agreed to it, and didn't go through with it, what does that say about you? yes, i admit that i wasn't very willing to walk out. but i agreed to do it. and i did it, out of loyalty to the group and to upload the agreement.

i honestly don't feel that the PMs know what happened well enough to critize and slam us about it. maybe that wasn't intentional, but our group was quite upset about the obvious pin-pointing. no, i'm not saying that it wasn't our fault. but the PMs see us for, at most, two to three hours a day, while jh108 spends more than double of that time together. do you think that after three months we don't know what our classmates are like? i feel that the PMs only see a small fraction of what goes on. they miss out on a lot. things that happen are not always done on purpose or whatever, but sometimes just plain invoked. the PMs heard from gwen, martin, rachel ann and sheryl. that's a mere 16%. can you say that they speak for the rest of the class? we are, very different people. our opinions differ. we have different sets of morals. but i don't think it's right to break an agreement regardless. i think it's widely known that one sees what he wants to see, and may not always be objective.

regardless, i hope this won't happen again. and that this calls for greater teamwork and planning.

on a seperate note, tomorrow is the last day, so please bring the newspapers. i keep reminding you guys but nothing gets done. you tell me to shut up that i've said it so many times, but what, do you do anything? so please, please, bring the newspapers. each person, please try to cough up 'bout 10cm of newspapers. i hope you received gwen's message, i really don't want to stay back extra or see people get scolded. thank you.

oh and richelle please change the blogskin since jx hasn't done so.

ruiying :)